Factual vs. evidential? [Elektronisk resurs]The past tense forms of spoken Khalkha Mongolian

Publicerad:Amsterdam :Publicerad:John Benjamins Publishing Company,Publicerad:2018

gratis
Past tense forms of spoken Khalkha Mongolian distinguish between established (- sang ) and non-established knowledge, which is then either based on direct (- laa ) or indirect (- jee ) evidence. Time of acquisition thus determines whether information source is marked, though vivid recollection (- laa ) and deferred realization (- jee ) overrule it. Conversely, attempted recollection in questions (- l=uu ) doesn’t presuppose sensory perception. A fourth suffix (- v ) is used if well-established events still surprise the speaker. These suffixes may also be used in a discontinuous fashion to refer to the future and then modally qualify predictions as inevitable (- sang ), apprehended [but preventable] (- v ), based on sensory evidence (- laa ) or inferred (- jee ). The distinction between unsourced - sang and sourced - laa /- jee is thus not about factual stance, but codes the extent to which information is consolidated in memory.

Inställningar Hjälp

Beståndsinformation saknas

Fler titlar av: Brosig, Benjamin, 19 ...; Stockholms universit ...
Fler titlar om: Humanities and the A ...; Languages and Litera ...; Specific Languages; Humaniora och konst; Språk och litteratur; Studier av enskilda ...; visa fler...; Linguistics; lingvistik; visa färre...
Serie: Fler delar
Värdpublikation: Evidence for evident ...; Fler artiklar
Värdpublikation i annat format: Evidence for evident ...

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.